Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 17, 1987No. 69147PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Karl Burnett sued Roger Griffith, a security guard, and Griffith’s employers, East Hills Merchants Association and Belt Highway Investment Company, for assault, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. On the assault count the jury returned a verdict for Burnett and against the three defendants, awarding $1,500 in actual damages. On the false imprisonment and malicious prosecution claims, the jury found in favor of defendant Griffith, but against East Hills and Belt Highway, awarding actual damages of $5,000 and $20,000, respectively, on those counts.

On his appeal to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Douglass v. SafireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Moran v. North County Neurosurgery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Williams v. Venture Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Burtrum v. U-Haul Co. of Southern MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Margarita Rivera De Feliciano, Etc. v. Francisco De Jesus, Etc., Farm Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Blaine v. J.E. Jones Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Bank of Kirksville v. SmallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API