Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Cornell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1937No. 7954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit. Judge.

Appellants, all citizens of Texas, are brothers and sisters, nieces and nephews of complainants — appellants in Seeley et al. v. Cornell et al., 90 F.(2d) 562, No. 8336 on the docket of this court, this day decided. They, on January 26, 1935, after its reversal on the first appeal, prayed and were- granted leave to intervene in that cause. Upon allegations as to each of them substantially the same as those the original bill had made, each intervenor sought to charge defendants as trustees for his use and benefit, and to obtain an accounting as -to -the undivided…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ruff v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Long v. StitesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. Lupfer v. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  5. Gaddis v. JunkerDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Johnson v. Riverland Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. Glover v. McFaddinDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1951
  5. Sun Oil Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API