Weed v. Occhiato
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This action was initiated by the Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Pueblo, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106. The validity of the tax imposed against the company under the provisions of the Colorado Sales and Use Tax Law for its purchases of glass bottles from bottle manufacturers is in issue. The district court held that the bottles were specifically exempt from taxation, and the Director of Revenue of the State of Colorado brought this appeal. We concur in the district court’s interpretation of the statute and affirm the judgment.
C.R.S. 1963, 138-5-2 (14), provides for the following sales tax…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Evans v. Memphis Dairy Exchange, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Undercofler v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
3Cited by12 opinions
- Goebel v. Colorado Department of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Miller International, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- State Department of Revenue v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Cohen v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.