Legal Opinion

Undercofler v. Buck

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1963No. 39951, 40000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The stipulations of fact in the present cases show that Supply, a distributor, sells milk bottles and cases to milk processors and distributors for packaging, storing, shipping, and delivering milk. Supply’s customers sell milk directly to consumers, or to wholesalers who sell to consumers. The milk distributors and processors hope to use the bottles and cases more than one time; they diligently seek t® have bottles and cases returned for reuse; they do not customarily require a deposit of their customers (wholesalers or consumers), but retailers who sell milk in glass bottles…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oxford v. J. D. Jewell, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Evans v. Memphis Dairy Exchange, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. Oxford v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Department of Revenue v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Associated Beverage Co. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Weed v. OcchiatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Undercofler v. MacOn Linen Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API