Legal Opinion

McCarley v. . Council

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

In Brown v. R. R., 202 N. C., 256, 162 S. E., 613, it was held that the personal representative, in that ease the administrator, of a deceased employee, who has accepted from the employer, or from his insurance carrier, compensation for the death of the employee, under the provisions of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, can maintain in his own name an action to recover of a third person, who by his negligence has caused the death of the employee, damages for such death. For this reason, there was no error in the order of the Superior Court in that case, striking from the answer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Cunningham v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Phifer v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. R. G. Chapman & Co. v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Betts v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  3. Mack v. Marshall Field & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Roberts v. City Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Mack v. . Marshall Field Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API