M. P. Hubbard & Co. v. Horne
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The defendants W. H. Horne and the North Carolina Bank and Trust Company denied the plaintiff’s alleged priority of liens and filed a cross-bill praying reformation of the instruments under which the plaintiff claims. It is not questioned that courts of equity have jurisdiction to correct written instruments which have been erroneously framed so that they shall express the real meaning and’intention of the parties; but the plaintiff denies that the evidence is sufficient to justify the reformation of his papers. This position calls for an inspection of the record in the light of principles…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Sills v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Table Rock Lumber Co. v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Finishing & Warehouse Co. v. OzmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sykes v. Keiltex Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Carter v. West American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Lawrence v. HeavnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State Trust Co. v. BraznellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Archer v. . McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.