Legal Opinion

Finethy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 1, 2007No. 4D05-4791PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The appellant, Robert Finethy, challenges his resentencing after the trial court granted his motion to correct his illegal sentence. He contends that the trial court sentenced him beyond the legal *991maximum when it resentenced him for attempted second-degree murder after granting his motion to correct his sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because the court could lawfully impose an upward departure sentence and make it consecutive to other sentences originally imposed, we hold that the sentence was not illegal and affirm.

Finethy was convicted and sentenced in 1996…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Gibbs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Morganti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Norton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. James Nathaniel Marshall v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. State of Florida v. James Nathaniel MarshallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API