Adams v. Heisel
United States Circuit Court
In Chance ¡y.
1Opinion of the CourtWelker, J.
The complainants allege that about the year 1884, while doing business in the city of New York, they commenced the preparation, manufacture, and sale of a certain form of chewing gum; and that they invented and composed therefor a trade-mark, which was wholly original with themselves, viz., “Sappota Tolu,” and describe how they put up the gum, and the boxes in which it was packed, with letters and pictorial ornaments, with panels and borders used upon such boxes; *280and that they have continuously used the said trade-mark, and put upon market their gum in boxes labeled and decorated as…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Capewell Horse Nail Co. v. MooneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1909
- Dennison Mfg. Co. v. Scharf Tag, Label & Box Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- In Re Dennison Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- De Long Hook & Eye Co. v. Francis Hook & Eye & Fastener Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1902
- Société Anonyme de la Distillerie de la Liqueur Benedictine de L'abbaye de Fecamp v. PuzielloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1918