Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Cusyck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in compelling Mary K. Mayer (plaintiff) to provide unrestricted authorizations for her medical records without first conducting an in camera review of those records to determine whether they are material and related to any *938physical and mental conditions affirmatively placed in controversy by plaintiffs (see, Carter v Fantauzzo, 256 AD2d 1189, 1190; Moon v Sheraton Corp., 110…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carter v. FantauzzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Sadicario v. Stylebuilt Accessories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Geraci v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Moon v. Sheraton Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nichter v. Erie County Medical Center Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Tirado v. KoritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Tabone v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- GOETCHIUS, JOYCE A. v. SPAVENTO, M.D., PERRY J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cargile v. BarrowOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.