Legal Opinion
Cargile v. Barrow
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2009No. C-080423PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} John Barrow hit Joyce Cargile’s car with his car; Cargile sued. She alleged that the accident had caused her to suffer neck, leg, back, and head pain.
{¶ 2} Barrow requested discovery from Cargile, including a blank authorization for all of Cargile’s medical records. Cargile refused. Barrow alleged in various documents that Cargile had admitted in discovery responses that she had suffered from headaches and leg pain before the accident. (That piece of discovery is not part of the record.)
{¶ 3} While Cargile released records for some medical providers, she…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Pina v. EspinozaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Nester v. Lima Memorial HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cardenas v. JerathSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Baptist Mem. Hosp. v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pinnix v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mason v. BookerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Csonka-Cherney v. ArcelorMittal Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Evans v. Summit Behavorial HealthcareOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Watkins v. Good Samaritan Hosp. of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.