Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
I. Defendant’s Appeal
1. The Clayton Act issue.
The complaint charged the violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and § 3 of the Clayton Act. Plaintiffs demanded a jury trial. The jury found that the defendant sold Bendix machines to the plaintiffs under tie-in contracts restricting the use of meters, boilers, clocks, soaps, schedule pads, and like commodities, to those supplied by the defendant. The jury also found that such tie-in arrangements did not tend to create a monopoly or substantially to lessen competition in commerce. Whether or not this latter question was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Packard Motor Car Company v. The Webster Motor Car Company, the Webster Motor Car Company v. Packard Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Bernard Susser v. Carvel Corporation, Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc., Carvel Stores Realty Corporation, and Eight Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.