Haynes Ex Rel. Haynes v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
The Rules of the Operating Department of the defendant railroad provide for discharge on the following grounds: “Disloyalty, dishonesty, desertion, intemperance, immorality, vicious or uncivil conduct, insubordination, incompetency, wilful neglect, inexcusable violation of rules resulting in endangering, damaging or destroying life or property, making false statements, or concealing facts concerning matters under investigation will subject the offender to summary dismissal.”
Likewise, the Agreement between the defendant and the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees contains these…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Brighton v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Spires v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Walker v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1965
- Ehmann v. Medflow, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2020