Legal Opinion

Brighton v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1894PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Einne, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

On October 19, 1874, the plaintiff, at the time an employé of the defendant, was injured by reason of a collision of trains upon its railroad. The plaintiff subsequently made a claim against the defendant,.through *422Charles R. Miller, Esq., his attorney, for damages, and on March 24, 1875, a settlement was made between them. Counsel for the appellant state in their brief that the whole controversy grows out of a disagreement as to what-the tertns of the settlement were. It seems to be conceded that the defendant paid to.the plaintiff the sum of $540, and that the plaintiff executed a release…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dailey v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lynas v. Maxwell FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Horvath v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Wallace v. American Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API