Petrocelli Construction v. Epstein
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County
1Opinion of the Court
SOKOLOVE, J.,
Several petitions are before us for decision pursuant to Bucks County Rule of Civil Procedure 266. We will incorporate an explanation of the petitions into the following statement of the factual and procedural history of the case.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. As dictated by a construction contract between the parties, plaintiff Petrocelli Construction submitted a demand for arbitration to the American. Arbitration Association against defendants Ellen Epstein, Gene Epstein and Marlene Epstein, individually as tenants by the entirety and/or t/a Gene Epstein Enterprises.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Everson v. EversonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Beriker v. Permagrain Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ruehl v. Maxwell Steel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.