Legal Opinion

United States v. Norberto

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 15, 2005No. 04 CR 328(ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This case involves allegations that the defendants Michael Norberto (“Norberto”), Christine Forsythe (“Forsythe”), and Robin Hansson (“Hansson”), collectively (the “Defendants”), operated an illegal gambling enterprise in the United States that sold shares in a lottery conducted by the Government of Spain to customers around the world. On January 21, 2005, Hansson pleaded guilty to the second count in the indictment which charged the Defendants with a money laundering conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(A)® and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Nick StavroulakisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Charles R. DaurayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PalfreyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Scope of Exemption Under Federal Lottery Statutes for Lotteries Conducted by a State Acting Under the Authority of State Law, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API