Flynn v. Currie
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This is an action of assumpsit on a check. It was brought by the endorsee against the maker, who stopped payment. *462The plea is the general issue, and there is brief statement of special matter of defense, the nature of which will presently be apparent.
At the close of the evidence, the jury was ordered to return a verdict for the plaintiff, .and defendant excepted.
The question presented is whether, upon any reasonable view of the evidence, the jury could have found a verdict for the defendant.
The check, though it appears to have been negotiated outside this State, bears upon its face every mark…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Mason v. BlaytonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Bourisk v. AmalfitanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Coseboom v. Marshall TrustNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Diemar & Kirk Company v. Smart Styles, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Dole Company v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.