Legal Opinion

Coseboom v. Marshall Trust

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1960No. 6674PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff-appellee to recover $1,000, represented by a check in that amount given by defendant-appellant as a down payment on the purchase of a house from appellee, payment of the said check having been stopped.

A motion to dismiss the complaint was filed by appellant, on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action, and on the further ground that there being no agreement in writing or note or memorandum signed by appellant, the action could not be maintained because of the statute of frauds. The motion to dismiss having been…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pitek v. McGuireNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Farrar v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Thompson v. SchurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Usher v. A. S. Tucker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Albers v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Herrera v. C & R PAVING COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hoskins v. Albuquerque Bus CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. J. A. Silversmith, Inc. v. MarchiondoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Allsop Lumber Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API