Legal Opinion

Munro v. Meech

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Charlevoix. (Ramsdell, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

One Cole, being the owner in fee of a piece of land bordering on a lake in the village of South' *597Arm, Charlevoix county, executed to one John Munro an instrument of conveyance, the material parts of which read .as follows:

“ Whereas, the said party of the first part, at the time ■of the sealing and delivery of these presents, is seized in fee of certain premises, described as follows, to wit: A piece of land whose superficial area is to be not less than 120 feet by 120 feet, and' to have a frontage upon the south arm of Pine lake of not less than 120 feet, and a frontage of not less than 120…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. HasbrouckMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Moran v. LezotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ryan v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Franks v. FecheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schulz v. BrohlMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Zemon v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Purlo Corp. v. 3925 Woodward Avenue, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bubser v. RanguetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Butler v. Dillehay Brick Company's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API