Legal Opinion
Bollitier v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 18, 1989No. Civ. A. 85-5311PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
GERRY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, James J. Bollitier, brought this action pursuant to § 101(a)(5) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(5), challenging his expulsion from membership by Teamsters Local 676. Jurisdiction exists in this court under 29 U.S.C. § 412. Plaintiff’s primary contention at trial was that his expulsion violated his “full and fair hearing” rights under § 101(a)(5) of the LMRDA. Plaintiff’s case was tried to the court on October 5 and 6, 1988. Plaintiff represented himself at trial, with some assistance from the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. HardemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Daniel P. Quinn v. Joseph L. Digiulian, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Mark Tincher v. Harry Piasecki, President, United Steelworkers of America, District 31, Local Union No. 1014Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Local Union No. 38, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Afl-Cio v. PelellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Yager v. CareyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Local Union No. 38 v. PelellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Bollitier v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Estenich v. HeenanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.