Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Mull

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 5, 1960No. 37943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. Special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial assigns error on the exclusion of certain testimony by the defendant, the witness Ernest Lair and the plaintiff himself on cross-examination, relative to the quarrelsome and violent character of the plaintiff. There is- only one assignment of error on the exclusion of all of the testimony ,on this subject. A portion of Lair’s testimony on direct examination concerns particular acts of a quarrelsome and violent nature on the part of the plaintiff. Where it becomes material to- inquire whether a party possesses a quarrelsome…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Atlanta Street Railroad v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Macon Railway & Light Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Miller v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. Norman v. McMillanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Harris, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Millholland v. NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Akop v. BransonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Morgan v. MullCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API