Akop v. Branson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. Where on the trial of an action seeking recovery for pain and suffering because of injuries received in an automobile collision the plaintiff’s husband on direct examination testified over objection as to his observations of plaintiff and that when she moved her arm he could “see the pain in her face” and if someone “bumped into her, you could tell it hurt her” (see Macon R. &c. Co. v. Mason, 123 Ga. 773 (8) (51 SE 569); Morgan v. Mull, 101 Ga. App. 36 (4) (112 SE2d 661); Stewart v. Wilson, 92 Ga. App. 514 (88 SE2d 752); Bagwell & Stewart, Inc. v. Bennett, 214 Ga. 780 (107…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Macon Railway & Light Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Brewer v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines Inc. v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Brown Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Georgia Power Company v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Georgia Power Company v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970