Legal Opinion

Herbo-Phosa Co. v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 25, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action oe the Case in assumpsit. Heard on agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtVincent, J.

This is an action of the case in assumpsit against a liability insurance company to recover, under the terms of its policy, for a loss sustained by the plaintiff as defendant in an action at law, including costs and expenses.

Ann E. Congdon, administratrix upon the estate of her father, John E. Whipple, brought a suit against the Herbo-Phosa Company to recover damages for the death of said Whipple which, as alleged, was brought about by the negligence of said company, or its predecessor, the Modox Company. The Herbo-Phosa Company was insured against accident in the defendant casualty company.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stenbom v. Brown-Corliss Engine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kennedy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Combs v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
  2. Morehouse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Ray v. MoxonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Eberlein v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Shea v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API