Swed Distributing Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
This case, now before us for the second time, presents the question whether the taxpayer, Swed Distributing Company, a Florida corporation, is entitled to deduct as ordinary and necessary business expenses certain payments made to Swed and Sullivan, a partnership composed of the taxpayer’s two stockholders. The nature of the case requires close scrutiny of the record.
Louis Swed and John L. Sullivan formed a partnership to go into the beer distributing business in Florida on December 30, 1944. Through one George 0. Hinzpeter, the partnership was able to obtain a Florida…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lilly v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- B. Forman Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Warren Burnett and Emma Burnett v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- B. Forman Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, McCurdy & Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, B. Forman Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, McCurdy & Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Ex Parte EdmanTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Virginia National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.