Ex Parte Edman
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This is a habeas corpus proceeding. It is another of a series of disputes between those who represent the majority and the minority chapter members of the Texas Society, Daughters of the American Revolution, Inc. [DAR]. See Governing Board v. Panniil, 561 S.W.2d 517 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1978, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Texas Society v. Fort Bend Chapter, 590 S.W.2d 156 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1978, writ ref’d n. r. e.). The question presented is whether Georgia B. Edman and Crystelle R. Wickett, acting as officers of and upon authorization of the Society in paying legal expenses,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Trust Under the Will of Bingham v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Commissioner v. TellierSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ex Parte WerbludTexas Supreme Court · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Governing Board v. PannillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Texas Society, Daughters of the American Revolution, Inc. v. Estate of HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989