Legal Opinion
Hare v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 4, 1999No. 98-2421PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
743 So.2d 551 (1999)
Laurens Tykle HARE, Appellant,
v.
MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, a Michigan partnership including professional corporations, and its successors in interest by merger or otherwise; George F. deClaire, individually; and Michael R. Atkins, individually, Appellees.
No. 98-2421.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
August 4, 1999.
Rehearing Denied November 2, 1999.
Brian M. O'Connell of Boose Casey Ciklin Lubitz Martens McBane & O'Connell, West Palm Beach, and A. Faxon Henderson, Jr., of Henderson & Robinson, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellant.
Peter A. Sachs of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Espinosa v. Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Rosen and HeilbronnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Angel, Cohen & Rogovin v. Oberon Inv., NVSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- J.D.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sisson v. JankowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Carvel v. GodleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Passell v. WattsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Babcock v. MaloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Smith v. DeParryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.