Legal Opinion

Haines v. Nance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of McDonough County; the Hon. Charles J. Scofield, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the Court.

However strong the defense sought to be made may appear to be in merit or in point of equity, it can not prevail under the rules of law applicable to the instrument in suit and the act of the appellees in connection therewith. The instrument has all the qualities of a bill of exchange (3 Kent’s Com., 74; Daniel’s negotiable Instruments, 493-495; Randolph’s Commercial Paper, Vol. 1, page 2), except it does not contain Avords at one time deemed necessary to give it the quality of negotiability.

By the force and effect of Sec. 3, Chap.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scanlan v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hypes v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Johnson v. GloverIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Courtney v. HoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bright v. KenefickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API