Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. of New York v. Norton

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1922No. 256-3472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of First Supreme Judicial District. Action by L. E. Norton, administrator de bonis non of the estate of George E. Chase, deceased, against the American Surety Company of New York and another. From judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (220 S. W. 437) affirming judgment for plaintiff, defendant named brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

On October 5, 1912, Dana E. Chase was appointed, by the county court of Harris county, administrator of the estate of George E. Chase, deceased. The American Surety Company of New York became the surety on the administrator’s bond At the time of his appointment, Dana E. Chase was indebted to the estate of George E. Chase, as evidenced by a promissory note, for the principal sum of $3,000, amounting, at the time of the judgment in the district court, to $4,056.75, after deducting certain payments made thereon. The note was listed in the inventory of the estate, as shown by the administrator’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wright v. LangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. State ex rel. McClamrock v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Howell v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lyon v. OsgoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
  5. Rader v. YearginTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Wood v. TuohyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  4. American Indemnity Co. v. EnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API