Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Eugster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2009No. 200,568-3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

209 P.3d 435 (2009)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Stephen K. EUGSTER, an attorney at law.

No. 200,568-3.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 11, 2009.

Shawn Timothy Newman, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, Kris J. Sundberg, Law Office of Kris J. Sundberg, Mercer Island, WA, for Petitioner.

Jonathan Henry Burke, Washington State Bar Assoc., Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

CHAMBERS, J.

¶ 1 Stephen K. Eugster practiced law for 34 years without a history of discipline.[1] Then the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) charged Eugster with nine counts of attorney misconduct based…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  2. In re Theodore Studdert-Kennedy / In re PRB-021-2022 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API