Legal Opinion
State v. Halsten
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 26, 2001No. 26149-9-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 P.3d 751 (2001)
108 Wash.App. 759
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Edward C. HALSTEN, Appellant.
No. 26149-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
October 26, 2001.
Manek R. Mistry, Backlund & Mistry, Chehalis, WA, for appellant (Court-appointed).
J. Andrew Toynbee, Deputy Pros. Atty., for respondent.
ARMSTRONG, C.J.
The State charged Edward Halsten with possessing pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine because Halsten possessed cold tablets that contained pseudoephedrine hydrochloride. At trial, the State's expert testified that pseudoephedrine hydrochloride is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CromwellWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CromwellWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Brunson v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.