Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Georgia Packing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, Circuit Judge.
In their petition for rehearing, appellees misapply certain specified cases cited in the opinion. The cases of Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. Martin,1 Lancaster v. McCarty,2 and Boston & Maine R. Co. v. Hooker3 were not cited as authorities for determining the degree of care required of a carrier in transporting or refrigerating perishable goods. They were cited to illustrate in general the point that shipment of goods by rail interstate is subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and that under the Act the responsibility assumed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Standard Hotel Supply Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Lancaster v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Austin v. Seaboard Air Line R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951