Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. McCarty

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 9, 1925No. 148PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

This was a suit for damages in the County Court of Eastland'County, Texas, by the defendants in error, partners as the Cisco Furniture Company, to recover from the plaintiffs in error, the Receivers of the Texas & Pacific Railway, $198 for injury to two rugs and to three chairs' shipped by the Furniture Company from Fort Worth, Texas, over the Railway to Cisco, Texas, and $20 for attorney’s fees exacted by a state statute for the delay of the Railway in allowing and paying the claim. The real issue here is whether the amount of the damages for the admitted injury should be measured by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States Ex Rel. Champion Lumber Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. TysonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Georgia Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  3. Costner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Porter v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BrashearCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API