Legal Opinion

Weaver v. State Industrial Insurance System

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1988No. 18416PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a claimant is entitled to an award of interest on workers’ compensation benefits paid only after successful litigation. We conclude that the claimant is not so entitled.

Chapter 616 of the Nevada Revised Statutes sets forth a comprehensive system for the compensation of industrial injuries. Because the system is uniquely legislative in nature, and alters the common law rights and liabilities of both employees and employers, we have previously refused to disturb the delicate balance created by the legislature by implying provisions not expressly…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Land & Marine Rental Co. v. RawlsAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Goldstine v. Jensen Pre-CastNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State Industrial Insurance System v. WeaverNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Tisdel v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Christopher R. Brown, D.D.S., Inc. v. Decatur County Memorial HospitalIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ransier v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State Industrial Insurance System v. WrennNevada Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API