State v. Brady
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.
Lee County has not elected to operate county liquor stores under tbe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act of 1937. In consequence, this case is controlled by tbe Turlington Act of 1923 as modified by tbe provisions of tbe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act applicable to counties not engaged in operating county liquor stores. S. v. Fuqua, 234 N.C. 168, 66 S.E. 2d 667; S. v. Welch, 232 N.C. 77, 59 S.E. 2d 199.
These propositions are established law in counties which do not operate county liquor stores under tbe Alcoholic Beverage Control Act of 1937 :
1. Under tbe relevant section of the Turlington Act,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. FuquaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. . SuddrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. StroupeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Hawkins Ex Rel. Hawkins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.