Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
As the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) attempts to make take-or-pay problems a thing of the past, the transition to other systems has presented its own genre of problems. This case illustrates one such problem. In simple terms, FERC issued an order providing two basic ways in which pipelines could (1) recover outstanding take-or-pay costs and (2) bill their sales customers for the cost of maintaining a future inventory of natural gas for those customers. Order No. 500, Regulation of Natural Gas…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- K N Energy, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Western Gas Resources, Inc., Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.