Legal Opinion

State v. McClellan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2009No. 20080350PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 This court granted certiorari on the following issues: (1) Whether the court of appeals erred in its assessment of defendant Carl McClellan’s contention of plain error and ineffective assistance of counsel to sup*958port his argument that the Utah County Attorney’s Office should have been disqualified by the association of his former defense counsel, and (2) Whether the court of appeals erred in its assessment of Defendant’s claim of error as to the State’s presentation of an audio recording as rebuttal evidence. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

BACKGROUND

¶2…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BrakeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Taylor v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. McClellan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. State v. BedellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API