Legal Opinion

Parkhill v. Doggett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 16, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Keokuk District Court.- — Hon. W. G. Clements, Judge. Suit to partition lands. There was a judgment establishing the respective interests of the parties and ordering a sale of the lands for the purpose of partition. Both parties appeal. The defendants having appealed first will be called appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

The plaintiff, as- trustee for certain heirs of A. J. Doggett, deceased, owns a one-ninth interest in the land sought to be partitioned, and the defendant Eugene Doggett owns the remaining eight-ninths interest therein. The land involved consists of two hundred and twenty-two acres, which is separated by the record and evidence into two tracts, known as the “one hundred and two acre tract” and the “one hundred and twenty acre tract,” respectively. Both tracts of land were sold to the appellant Eugene Doggett in December, 1900, by a referee duly appointed to sell the same pursuant to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dodge v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. Austin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Rippe v. BadgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Parkhill v. DoggettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Todd v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Van Veen v. Van VeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Indra v. WigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Van Veen v. Van VeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API