Legal Opinion

Robinson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1949No. 12926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

When appellant and appellee were here before,1 their positions were reversed. Then the United States was appealing from findings, that the duty to supply maintenance and cure had not been discharged but still existed, and a judgment allowing maintenance and cure from October 1, 1946, to January 1, 1948.

This time, Robinson, the claimant, appeals from findings, that his condition was incurable, at least by January 7, 1948, and that the duty to supply maintenance and cure no longer existed, and a judgment denying his claim to it for the period from January 1, 1948, to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. Muruaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Travis v. Motor Vessel Rapids CitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Travis v. The Motor Vessel Rapids CitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API