Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtForst, J.
Appellants Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. (“Searcy Den-ney”), et al. appeal the refusal of the guardianship court to authorize payment of $2.5 million in attorneys’ fees to the firms involved in the litigation of a medical malpractice lawsuit, the appeal, and a subsequent lobbying effort to secure a claims bill (also deemed a “private relief act”) from the Legislature on behalf of Aaron Edwards and his parents. The legislative claims bill placed a limitation on the use of funds to pay legal fees and costs, and it is this limitation that is the subject of the instant appeal.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
- Cauley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Crist v. FL. ASS'N OF CRIM. DEFENSE LAWYERSSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Grossman Roth, P.A. v. MellenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017