Legal Opinion

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 2015No. 4D13-3497PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForst, J.

Appellants Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. (“Searcy Den-ney”), et al. appeal the refusal of the guardianship court to authorize payment of $2.5 million in attorneys’ fees to the firms involved in the litigation of a medical malpractice lawsuit, the appeal, and a subsequent lobbying effort to secure a claims bill (also deemed a “private relief act”) from the Legislature on behalf of Aaron Edwards and his parents. The legislative claims bill placed a limitation on the use of funds to pay legal fees and costs, and it is this limitation that is the subject of the instant appeal.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  4. Cauley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Crist v. FL. ASS'N OF CRIM. DEFENSE LAWYERSSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Grossman Roth, P.A. v. MellenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API