Legal Opinion · Dissent

Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 31, 2017No. SC15-1747Published

1DissentCanady, J.

I dissent from the majority’s decision regarding both the certified question and the issue of severability.

I would adhere to our decision in Gamble v. Wells, 450 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1984), and answer the certified question in the affirmative. The enactment of section 768.28, Florida Statutes, has in no way undermined the reasoning of Gamble, which recognized the broad constitutional power of the Legislature in addressing a claims bill:

[The claimant] could only request that the legislature grant the compensation sought. The legislature then, as a matter of grace, could allow compensation, decide…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cramp v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF ORANGESupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Presbyterian Homes of Synod of Florida v. WoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Kass v. LewinSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. Gamble v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API