Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Foot & Cole

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided July 9, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This is an appeal by Joel W. Foot and Charles Cole, (the defendants,) from a judgment in favor of George. Boyd, (the plaintiff,) entered on the 14th of September, 1858, for $1,415.79, and costs, on the report of Willis Hall, Esq., as Referee.

Read the full summary

This is an appeal by Joel W. Foot and Charles Cole, (the defendants,) from a judgment in favor of George. Boyd, (the plaintiff,) entered on the 14th of September, 1858, for $1,415.79, and costs, on the report of Willis Hall, Esq., as Referee. The action was brought in August, 1856, to recover a balance alleged to be due to the plaintiff’s assignor, Henry 0. Goodwin, as a member of the firm of Foot & Cole, alleged to have consisted of the defendants and of said Goodwin, and to have continued from October 1, 1855, to April 1, 1856, and to have been then dissolved by mutual consent. The…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court—Bosworth, Ch. J.

The Referee has found that Henry C. Goodwin, the plaintiff’s assignor, and the defendants, were partners, under the name of Foot & Cole, from the 1st of October, 1855, to the 1st of April, 1856. The Referee has also found that the sum of $1,415.79 was due, at the date of his report, from the defendants to the plaintiff, upon a just statement of the accounts between the partners. The defendants do not seek'to disturb the decision that Goodwin and Foot and Cole were partners. o

They complain that two counterclaims which they set up were rejected, and that they were…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. McMullinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Tenny & McKenzie v. Mulvaney & BemisOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Sprague v. . HosmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Beers v. WaterburyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API