Legal Opinion

State v. Curit

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 2, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Defendant Lawrence Curit appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 (Supp.1980), after a jury trial in Superior Court (York County). The only issue on appeal is whether the trial justice erred when he asked a state’s witness to demonstrate how he administered a chemical breath test. We affirm the judgment.

During the trial, the state’s attorney asked Trooper Michael Harriman on two occasions to describe how he administered breath tests. On the first day of trial, Harriman testified briefly how a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BachelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. ChaplinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. State v. GreenwoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. LinnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. State v. LintSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DischerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  2. Rich v. FullerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. State v. PickeringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. Folsom v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANS.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API