Amato v. Pathmark, Inc.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated April 5, 2000, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to *349set aside, on the ground of inadequacy, the verdict on the issue of damages, and (2), as limited by their brief, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the same court, entered July 11, 2000, as awarded them only $5,000 against Pathmark, Inc., d/b/a Pathmark of Boro Park.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs.

The appeal from the…