Amato v. Pathmark, Inc.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Pathmark, Inc., d/b/a Pathmark of Boro Park, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), entered July 11, 2000, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff Edward Amato and against it in the principal sum of $5,000. The notice of appeal from an order of the same court entered November 18, 1999, is deemed to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the…