Johnson v. McNabb
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Steuben Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
This is an appeal' under the provisions of sections 630 and 631, R. S. 1881.
The reserved questions are duly presented, in a clear, distinct, and brief manner, by proper bill of exceptions.
Appellants’ complaint is in two paragraphs. In the second it is alleged that appellees had, some time prior *394to the institution of the action, for a good and sufficient consideration, licensed the construction of a tile drain across the lands owned by them, upon the faith of which license work had been done and money expended by appellees- and others interested therein, in the construction of such drain, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Steinke v. BentleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weber v. DoustWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Manley v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Keck v. State ex rel. National Cash Register Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Oil-Well Supply Co. v. PriddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Majenica Telephone Co. v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.