Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development Authority
Wyoming Supreme Court
1DissentRose, Justice
It is with grave concern and regret that I write this dissenting opinion — concern for the State of Wyoming as it seeks to play its unique and important part in the Nation’s energy dilemma — and regret that this court, when the opportunity presented itself in circumstances where — in my judgment— the legal vehicles were available, was unable to affirmatively respond to the legislature’s efforts to solve the minerals-impact problem.
The minerals-industry is causing massive and localized financial and physical discomfiture for Wyoming and its people. This is not because it intends this — but…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- DeHerrera v. HerreraWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.