Legal Opinion · Dissent

Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development Authority

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1978No. 4788Published

1DissentRose, Justice

It is with grave concern and regret that I write this dissenting opinion — concern for the State of Wyoming as it seeks to play its unique and important part in the Nation’s energy dilemma — and regret that this court, when the opportunity presented itself in circumstances where — in my judgment— the legal vehicles were available, was unable to affirmatively respond to the legislature’s efforts to solve the minerals-impact problem.

The minerals-industry is causing massive and localized financial and physical discomfiture for Wyoming and its people. This is not because it intends this — but…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. DeHerrera v. HerreraWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API