Legal Opinion
George v. Uponor, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 28, 2013No. Civil No. 12-249 ADM/JJKPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 14, 2013, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Movants Curtis and Tina Smith’s (“the Smiths”) Motion to Intervene [Docket No. 33] as well as the Smiths’ Motion to Permit Filing of Reply to Opposition to Motion to Intervene [Docket No. 60] (“Motion to Reply”).1 Plaintiff Tim George initiated this putative class action with a complaint against Defendants Uponor, Inc., Wirsbo Company, and Uponor Wirsbo, Inc. (together, “Defendants”) seeking recovery for allegedly faulty brass…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation, Gizella WeisshausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- In re Uponor, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- Coburn v. Daimlerchrysler Services North America, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018