Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Greenleaf

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1923No. 3939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Ephraim Eanson, Judge. Action by George T. Hanson against E. N. Greenleaf. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

In this action plaintiff seeks judgment against defendant on a promissory note. The complaint contains the usual allegations found in such cases.

The answer admits the execution and delivery of the note and that the plaintiff is the holder of the same, but denies that there is due the sum asked, or any other amount. For an affirmative defense the answer alleges that in the year 1917 the defendant was approached by a Mr. Clark, who *170owned some mining property in the state of Nevada, with a proposition for the sale of that property; that the defendant presented such proposition to plaintiff and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Martineau v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Central Bank of Bingham v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Smith v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jensen v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Nuttall v. BerntsonUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Starley v. Deseret Foods CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Kelley v. Moab State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API