Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brown

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1917No. 3030PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. N. Jl Harris, Judge. Action by Charles II. Smith against W. D. Brown. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover upon a promissory note. The complaint is in the usual form. The defendant, in his answer to the complaint admitted “the execution” of the note, but denied its delivery, and denied “the indebtedness therein alleged.” Among other things, the defendant also averred in his answer that “said note was given without consideration”; that it was given “by reason of the fraudulent representations of the plaintiff,” setting forth the circumstances in detail. The defendant also averred that several months prior to the execution of said note the plaintiff, by *29ce…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n of Lyons v. LakinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Paulson v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Martineau v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Julius Kessler & Co. v. PareliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Union Investment Co. v. EpleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Combined Metals, Inc. v. BastianUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Swanson v. SimsUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Waters v. Byers Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Central Bank of Bingham v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Handley v. DrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API