Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided March 31, 2014No. 2:11-cv-03502-JHHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES H. HANCOCK, Senior District Judge.

The court has before it the Motion (Doc. # 29) for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson”) on July 5, -2013. Pursuant to the court’s orders of July 9, 2013 (Doc. # 33), July 15, 2013 (Doc. # 35), and September 6, 2013 (Doc. # 40), the motion for summary judgment is now under submission and is considered herein without oral argument.

Having considered the briefs and evi-dentiary submissions, the court finds that Tyson’s motion for summary judgment is due to be granted for the reasons outlined below.

I. Procedural…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API