Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FULLAM, District Judge.
These private antitrust treble-damage actions have now been settled by agreement, except as against one defendant, with whom settlement arrangements have been worked out which will be completed in a few months. The sums to be paid in settlement total $22,175,000.00. Counsel for the plaintiffs have jointly petitioned for approval of counsel fees at the rate of 25% of the recovery, to be deducted from the settlement, together with expenses estimated at $50,000.00.
Earlier in this litigation, I ruled that certain of these actions were properly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Montague & Co. v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dunn v. H. K. Porter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- In Re SmithKline Beckman Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Oppenlander v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1974
- Mashburn v. National Healthcare, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1988
- Arenson v. Board of Trade of City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.