Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 1969No. 41734PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FULLAM, District Judge.

These private antitrust treble-damage actions have now been settled by agreement, except as against one defendant, with whom settlement arrangements have been worked out which will be completed in a few months. The sums to be paid in settlement total $22,175,000.00. Counsel for the plaintiffs have jointly petitioned for approval of counsel fees at the rate of 25% of the recovery, to be deducted from the settlement, together with expenses estimated at $50,000.00.

Earlier in this litigation, I ruled that certain of these actions were properly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Montague & Co. v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dunn v. H. K. Porter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. In Re SmithKline Beckman Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Oppenlander v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1974
  4. Mashburn v. National Healthcare, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1988
  5. Arenson v. Board of Trade of City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API